Comparative Tomato Yields: Organic Systems vs. Conventional
Production
by Steven A. Gaddini
Introduction
In today’s health conscious
society, there is increasing demand for organically produced commodities.
Organic produce commands a higher price than non-organic produce. The premium
for the organic commodities typically runs from thirty percent higher to as much
as double the going rate for regular produce. Organic farming can be an aspect
of a large conventional farming enterprise or it can present an economically
viable niche for the small producer or family farmer.
Steffen, et al. (1995) discussed
comparative yields of four systems of tomato production: high and low input
conventional production versus a high and low input organic system. My
experiment was similar to the research conducted by Steffen and his associates
in that both studies used organic soil building amendments to improve rooting
environment and provide fertility. However, the organic soil amendments used by
Steffen were much more complex (his mixture included horse and chicken manure,
hay, ground corncobs and gypsum) than those used in this study. Also, the
pesticides used in Steffen's research differed markedly from mine. His study
used rotenone and diazinon, along with botanical oils and biological agents
(insects and pathogenic bacteria). The study conducted by Steffen and his
associates was also much larger in scope, with elements as diverse as root hair
count and percent defoliation due to summer blight. My research was much
narrower in focus, emphasizing low costs and techniques practical for use by a
small-scale operator.
Objectives for this project
were:
Determine if
the yields achieved under organic fertilizer systems could at least approach
levels achieved under the conventional system.
Determine
efficacy of organic means of insect control as compared to conventional
pesticide control, as measured by yield. These objectives would allow a
researcher to ascertain if it would be worthwhile for a producer,
(particularly a small operator or family farmer) to attempt organic
production. If the yields produced by the organic systems were meager in
comparison to the conventional, it would not be a viable commercial enterprise
even with the increased price commanded by the organically produced
fruit.
Materials and Methods
The area used to conduct this study
was the backyard of my residence, 56 St. Francis Drive, Chico, Ca. Soil
composition throughout the experimental area was clay loam. The experimental
area was thickly overgrown with weeds. No vegetable gardening had been done in
the area for at least several years prior to the experiment.
I used a split plot design, with 6’
x 4’ blocks, each divided into three 16” wide main plots. I divided the
main plots into three subplots. Each of the six blocks contained nine
plants, one plant representing each treatment combination of main plot factor
and subplot factor.
Main plots contained a particular
soil treatment. I used two organic soil amendments and one conventional
fertilizer as a control. The organic soil amendments were decomposed peat moss
and rotted steer manure. The conventional fertilizer was Osmocote 10-10-10, a
commonly used sustained release, general-purpose fertilizer. After rototilling
the strips, the soil amendments were applied to the strips. A wooden frame
having inside dimensions of 16" by 4' by 6" high was laid in place and filled to
level surface with the soil amendment, which was then incorporated to a depth of
six inches with a shovel. The conventional fertilizer (40 grams per plant) was
incorporated to a depth of one-inch using a rake. Soil preparation was completed
by the end of March 1998.
The subplots were two organic and
one conventional insecticide. The organic insecticides were diatomaceous earth
and a hot pepper spray. The diatomaceous earth was originally intended as media
for swimming pool water filters and was applied using a plastic squeeze bottle.
The pepper spray was four ounces of pureed Habanero pepper mixed into one quart
of water. The conventional control was Sevin dust, a common pesticide.
Concentration was 27% active ingredient.
Nine to twelve inch specimens of Early Girl, a high yielding, flavorful,
indeterminate hybrid tomato variety were transplanted into the blocks using a
trowel. Planting was finished by the second week of April.
Rainfall was above average for the
area and temperatures were unseasonably cool and overcast throughout the months
of April and May. Rainfall returned to normal levels by late May but
temperatures remained unseasonably cool into mid June.
As a result of the cool, overcast
weather conditions which prevailed through the early part of the growing season,
the onset of fruit production was delayed until early July, approximately five
weeks behind schedule. As fruit ripened, it was harvested, bagged, then tagged.
Harvest and data recording ran through mid September 1998.
Results
There was no
interaction between soil amendment and pesticides (p> 0.9) so I compared soil
amendments across all levels of pesticides and pesticides across all levels of
soil amendments. Soil amendments did not differ in terms ofyield (p>0.3) and pesticides
did not differ in terms of yield –p>0.9.
Discussion
The results of the experiment
indicate yields produced under the organic systems are very similar to yields
produced by the conventional control. Is organic production more profitable than
conventional production? Many factors other than yield enter into the
profitability of any business enterprise. A sustainable system using organic
soil amendments would have higher labor costs due to the work inherent in soil
preparation. Weed control would also be more costly in an organic system. The
growing season got off to a late start due to the unfavorable weather conditions
associated with the 1998 El Nino weather phenomenon. A normal season would have
produced greater overall yields due to more favorable temperatures. With higher
yields, the organic fertilizer's cost per pound of fruit would be reduced. In
this case, the cost differential for producing organic versus conventional
tomatoes would also be reduced. Also snails caused damage to some plants.
Several plants succumbed to snail damage, while others may have been set back or
stunted, thus reducing yield.
My results were similar to the
results of the study conducted by Steffen. Steffen observed significant
increases in yield only when combining his high input organic system
(incorporated soil amendments, drip irrigation, mulch, and trellising) with the
use of synthetic pesticides and fungicides. His other systems (low input
organic, low input conventional and high input conventional) all produced yields
which were statistically similar.
Other research could be performed as
a follow up to my experiment. Other methods of organic fertilization could
be tested and compared against the methods used in this experiment and against a
conventional control. Soil amendments such as chicken manure or
incorporated green manure crops such as vetch, along with organic based
fertilizers such as fish emulsion are possibilities. This subsequent
research might suggest means of maximizing yield under organic conditions.
To perform this follow up research, I would increase the overall magnitude of
the experiment, adding more and larger blocks with greater numbers of
replicates. Also, I would use a determinate variety rather than the
indeterminate variety I used for the experiment. While a determinate
variety would have made for an enormous amount of labor when ready to harvest,
all could be accomplished in one fell stroke, rather than the season long
harvesting and data logging which I performed. By expanding the overall
scale of the experiment, influences of local factors such as the less than
optimal level of solar exposure prevalent in my experimental area could be
mitigated. In summation, my research suggested that organic systems of
production can produce yields comparable to conventional production, and coupled
with the premium price commanded by organic produce, can be an economically
viable means of production agriculture.
Literature cited
Steffen,-K.L.; M.S. Dann, J.K. Harper, S.J. Fleischer, S.S. Mkhize,
D.W. Grenoble, A.A. MacNab, K. Fager, and J.M. Russo. 1995. Evaluation of
the initial season for implementation of four tomato production systems.
J-Am-Soc-Hortic-Sci. 120 (2) p. 148-156.